Quantcast

South Middlesex Times

Sunday, November 17, 2024

Study links indirect gun violence exposure to decreased quality-of-life

Webp xnnt8msatdju03vi4cebrv8zrkjd

Jonathan Holloway President of Rutgers University | Rutgers University Official Website

Jonathan Holloway President of Rutgers University | Rutgers University Official Website

Living near gun violence, even without direct exposure or injury, significantly impacts quality of life, according to a study published in the Journal of Urban Health.

The New Jersey Gun Violence Research Center at Rutgers University found that shootings affect millions of Americans who are not included in traditional victim counts. Survey data from 7,785 adults in nine states, including New Jersey, assessed the effects of four types of gun violence exposure: being threatened with a gun, being shot, having a friend or family member get shot, and witnessing or hearing about a neighborhood shooting.

"We found that witnessing or hearing about a shooting in your neighborhood was the most common type of gun violence exposure, and it was associated with a decrease in quality of life across all five domains we measured," said lead author Jennifer Paruk, a research associate at the research center.

The study revealed that 37 percent of participants reported at least one type of gun violence exposure. The study population represented the overall population from those nine states—Colorado, Florida, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas and Washington—indicating that more than a third of people in these states face exposure to gun violence.

Neighborhood exposure was most prevalent at 22 percent, followed by knowing a shooting victim (19 percent), being threatened with a gun (13 percent), and being shot (2 percent).

Indirect exposure had nearly as significant an impact as direct victimization. Witnessing or hearing about neighborhood shootings predicted decreases in overall quality of life as well as physical, psychological, social and environmental well-being.

Researchers also examined cumulative exposure across all four types of gun violence experiences. They found that greater cumulative exposure predicted lower quality of life scores across all domains measured.

"Those with the most gun violence exposure—those who've been impacted in many different ways—have the lowest overall quality of life across all these different domains," Paruk said.

Individuals who reported all four types of gun violence exposure had an adjusted average physical quality of life score that was 11.14 points lower than those with no exposure on a scale from 0 to 100. Their environmental quality of life score was 7.18 points lower on average.

The study used the World Health Organization Quality of Life - Brief Scale to measure quality of life across physical, psychological, social and environmental domains. Researchers controlled for factors like income, education, prior abuse experiences, neighborhood safety perceptions and other demographics to isolate the relationship between gun violence exposure and quality-of-life outcomes.

Being threatened with a gun was associated with a 2.59-point decrease in physical quality of life while being shot linked to a 6.98-point decrease.

Paruk emphasized that the findings underscore the broad impact of gun violence beyond just those directly injured.

"We're really recognizing the effects that indirect gun exposure can have on many types of quality of life," she said. "For people who are getting care for gun violence—their family members in the hospital with them or who were at home taking care of them could use a lot of support."

The study suggests reducing neighborhood gun violence could have wide-ranging benefits for community well-being.

"Reducing gun violence in particular neighborhoods would improve life for everyone in those neighborhoods,” Paruk said.

While the study did not test specific interventions' efficacy or specifics about support services for those indirectly impacted by gun violence but noted such support is challenging to find.

"We might not even have support available to indirect victims," Paruk said. "And as a society we might not recognize the harms that gun violence exposure can have indirectly. We need to make sure that supports are available if people need them."

Researchers plan further analyses using survey data to examine how frequency and recency of gun violence exposures relate to health outcomes. They stated their findings reinforce considering gun violence as a broad public health issue affecting entire communities.

###

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

!RECEIVE ALERTS

The next time we write about any of these orgs, we’ll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.
Sign-up

DONATE

Help support the Metric Media Foundation's mission to restore community based news.
Donate

MORE NEWS